May 8, 2009

Full story of Protect your freedom movement

Rajiv Dixit

Interoduction About Protect your freedom movement

January 8, 1992 at Wardha in Maharashtra in the city called a meeting to protect your freedom of movement was started . Chief architect of the movement, Shri Banwari Lal Sharma and Shri Rajiv Dixit he told that the U.S. company responsible for the Bhopal gas tragedy, Union Carbide Swaraj campaign against the public were. Economic freedom and cultural freedom and save it for various activities were started . The major work of public enlightenment and mass literature for video and audio cassettes were made. Lecture at various places, etc. were started training camp. Indigenous goods at the local level to meet its domestic stores open for the start of the effort.

Slowly - too slowly increased freedom of movement and help people in Grahyta too. Today, the country's 12 states in 1500 and Tehsil level Jilastriy 300 units. 118 villages in the form of completely indigenous village has been developed which are against not only Pepsi Cola, Colgate products such as foreign companies have closed the sale, but also domestic farm system and chemical Khadon and without the seeds are Shankar. With the movement for quality Ai.aslail

Development of Swanand brand

The same as a brand has been developed - Swanand. Swanand the self (domestic) enjoy. Stores are run by the indigenous movement of the stock is said Swanand. Movement by the big 4-5 training classes per year are made. Save an independence movement called the Weekly News is also published. As India's agro-based country, so the movement of agriculture is considered to be his top priority. Under this system of indigenous farmers to cultivate inspiration is given. Khadon biological rather than chemical fertilizer, manure, etc., earthworms and dung to use, with agriculture and animal husbandry to add special emphasis is on movement. The second movement is a priority, the village - the village in the domestic production of goods.

Without government grants under the movement of the excellent quality and affordable has succeeded in making khadi. The third priority is the domestic distribution of products. The fourth movement is a priority, to promote indigenous system of medicine. Thus, in the last 13 years, the movement of the mass public enlightenment efforts made, the domestic distribution of products Nimaarn for a lot of work and have set up. With the availability of domestic product - to increase the quality with his efforts are also important.

The movement's national spokesman Rajiv Dixit of the Indian side of the edit portion of the talks.

Question: In 1991, the country's liberalization policies were initiated in 1992 and your movement is going on. But even after the fast pace of liberalization has been extended to multinational companies and the general sentiments of the people towards the products of foreign companies has increased. What is considered a failure of this movement?

Rajiv Dixit: This is not correct to say that the general trend of foreign products on behalf of the people has increased. General trend of the logo, while the opposite side is not like - such as the entry of multinational companies has increased, by the way - the way their opposition has also increased. Today in India, a place where foreign companies Pchasion against the local people according to their capacity and power struggle and the movement are doing. Success in many places, there is going to get to places. Today's boycott foreign companies has increased very rapidly. The boycott of foreign companies because most of the sale of products is reduced. The market trend, the constant use of the goods there, especially in the area of the percentage of their goods is becoming less. Many companies in the sale of such a decline in advertising that they have enough money to spend. Such as Pepsi, Coca Cola, Colgate Pamoliv, Hindustan Lever, etc. Practor and Gambl. So in the minds of people towards their sense of exclusion has increased.

Question: But the arrival of multinational companies has been increasing. Rajiv Dikshit: Yes, but that is because of government policy. Their sense of exclusion among the people, but on this question of the Government have not made up a pressure group. If he then became a pressure to the government will have to change their decision. Question: When is the spirit of the boycott or pressure on the government to make what is the reason?

Rajiv Dixit: Perhaps the people of India think that one of its kind of a way to change is opposed to the more favorable policy. If they think this way is not right, then made another way. Therefore, foreign companies and governments to bring the time - the time has changed. You remember that in 1991 the government of the foreign companies in this country to get started, people did not like his politics and government in 1996, he went away. Then came the new government, the NDA government. The government also changed the people.

Question: But the NDA government was effectively losing the second issue. It was not indigenous to the issue.

Rajiv Dikshit: No, no. The issue was indigenous. In the government before they made promises to people that they were indigenous to the will and independence. But their foreign policies and Pravlnbn were of the contrary. Therefore, people rejected them also. Hindutan in the last three years - four governments have changed and people did not support them. This means that people were not satisfied with their policies. It's another matter that even today the leaders of India have not learned it. And is an example. But the Chief Minister in India Rajystr of foreign companies are considered the most supportive, they all have lost the election badly. In Karnataka, S. M. Krishna, Chandrababu Naidu of Andhra Pradesh and Haryana Om Prakash Chautala of the people badly defeated. These three foreign companies coming in and supporters of liberalization were gross. But it is unfortunate that our leaders have not learned it. Question: So the point is made independently in the elections, but sometimes the issue is not indigenous. Rajiv Dixit: How is not? So on the ghost of the indigenous India is going on. That is the issue of our lives. In India, mostly indigenous people to use goods. Indigenous in the use of local goods is greater. The country a small group of foreign companies only buys goods. So, when the country's indigenous basis of runs on the same issue in the election is made.

Question: Nowadays, the idea of global village is going on. There are also a matter of Vsudav Kutumbkm is. Imagine how meaningful is it indigenous?

Rajiv Dixit: Vsudav Kutumbkm imagine the significance is more indigenous. This means that we are already well on our society and country Claan. Our good relations with neighboring countries and this relationship will be based on family or household will be. This means that which is required when, where, his Purti be. As in the most vulnerable family member gets the most love of all love, the same way as the country's weak, it will help so much. This is Vsudav Kutumbkm imagine. But today the United States by the idea of global village is being aired, according to her more and more countries more and more exploitation is considered to be appropriate. And today the world about which they have considered, that is, pro-US countries and the world's goods sold in more countries. This is their idea of a global village. This is different from the price of Vsudav Kutumbkm.

Question: But when we talk about the indigenous each country will have its own domestic price. Like, when Indian companies doing business in other countries will be the country's domestic price of our companies will resist. What is the solution of the conflict between?

Rajiv Dixit: The solution to this is that if India is such a thing in our countries that we were not born s. Similarly, things that we do not, and in other countries if they are, and we need it, we take them. Lane - is going to take a walk and want. Need-based business should always have in the world. Now that's a business, it is not need based. Today you force non-essential items are being sold and what items they need, they are being bought from you. This one-sided business.

Question: What is the need-based trade and business in an industry can not be stability? Today, almost all goods are made in all countries. India's textile and garment exports in all countries is made.

Rajiv Dixit: cloth is made all over the place but the place is not all cotton. Cotton in those countries can become, where cotton is. In countries in which the rubber is, there can be a rubber. In some other countries have. They do business all together. Anyone who needs, needs which he bought and he sold. Need-based business then it goes on is thousands of years, go ahead. It is not indigenous to any protest. Of things which you have no need at all, forcing them to sell in your market and the natural resources you need most is to take them from here. Is wrong. Such as India, a land-based production of raw materials and the most need. But today there's a very good quality of raw material price clamshell is being sold very expensive and non-essential goods prices is being bought. Such as cream, powder, lipstick, nail Polish, underwear, tea, coffee, sugar, wheat, rice, gram dal, etc. Why should we take out? Foreign companies need to take water from our water here is so full?

Question: The quality and availability, but also is an important aspect. General perception that the quality of the products of foreign companies is good. There are some products that normally makes the foreign companies in India are made or not made.

Dixit Rajiv: See, this is not any thing made in India. Needle in the country from becoming a super computer to have started. The other thing that India's low quality of products is also wrong. India's reality is that the quality of goods than foreign goods, but is not an ad for the Indian goods, the goods because we do not even need more ads. For example, in India's Neem Datun, his can not compare a Colgate. Colgate's all about the world as the dentist and medical colleges of the books say that the teeth for toothpaste is completely unnecessary. But unfortunately the Neem Datun and Colgate's ad does not like unnecessary thing in the day hundred times the ad appears. The importance of this ad is a lie that time - and often speaks to the people seems to be true.

Question: It seems all these things from a domestic economic thinking is just that. You use the goods made in India and was followed home. What is right?

Rajiv Dikshit: No, no. Swadeshi is a complete lifestyle. This is the basis of India's civilization. It has a small economic aspect. Only buy goods from indigenous indigenous does not follow. Conduct of our lives - thoughts, language, get-up, the food are all indigenous, then she is full. We speak indigenous languages, indigenous dress wear, the food indigenous to the local drug use.

Question: But normally when it is indigenous to only the emphasis on the use of domestic goods is.

Dixit Rajiv: so that it is the easiest. Domestic and foreign goods to use to give up the goods is easy. The rest is more difficult to work. Like to wear indigenous dress is a little difficult. There is also the influence of society on Angrejiyt. But I have to say that the use of domestic goods, is a small part of the indigenous movement. It is a big and important part of the ideology, values, system of medicine, food system, indigenous costumes, etc. to use.

Question: The emphasis on the movement of your plans?

Rajiv Dixit people in understanding and develop thinking, for this we have published a lot of literature, some audio - video cassettes and CDs have made. Training camps are at the local level and all these things are available to help do it.

Question: And for many indigenous organizations are active. Like, is the Swadeshi Jagran Manch, a number of organic farming organizations are trying, many Gaushalaon in the use of this type are running. Do not you think that being a better coordination among all of these results can be? Public pressure on the government more than can be made based domestic policies that he made?

Rajiv Dixit: These institutions work together, then the political pressure will become. Then according to their political will. When it can not meet, until then to dominate the political level. Some efforts in this direction are a good thing. But I believe that different - different institutions and the efforts needed. India is the specialty of the society that ever a thought, an organization and a person does not accept. So different - different institutions go, different - to be tried separately, there is no harm.

1 comment:

  1. sir pure bharat mein bahut sare log hai jo badlaw chahtein hain .aur ek bare revolt ke liye behad jaruri hai ki sare rastrawadi log ek dhara mein aayein.aapko jujharupan ko mera sat sat pranam.